O que é APQP? APQP é Advanced Product Quality Planning (planejamento avançado da qualidade do produto) Trata-se de um método estruturado e estabelecido para. ![]() Appraiser Variation in Gage R& R Measurement. MEASURE FOR. MEASUREby Donald S. Ermer. In part one of this column,1 I said if our data analysis is. Therefore, it is important to have a valid. Accuracy—in other. In part one, I reviewed the gage R& R study. Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG). ![]() This. showed why the standard deviations or measurement errors of the. AIAG method are not additive. In part two, I’m providing a worksheet. Tables 1 and 2, p.
Introduction of Appraiser Variation. Although the proper variances in part one. In actual situations, it is. Therefore, it is necessary to include. This is shown as BC in Figure 1 (p. BE in Figure 2 (p. It is calculated as the appraiser averages and and 1. Table 3 of part one) for two and three. With the addition of appraiser variation, the. The relationships among all the variations can. Figure 1 or 2. The total product measurement. In the AIAG study, the constants. However, these three. If. the number of subgroups is greater than or equal to 2. Otherwise, d. 2* is used. The number of subgroups and subgroup size. R& R study. For d. For. d. 2,o , the number of. For example, if a measurement study used five. Table 1 (p. 7. 5), with each part measured twice by each of the three. Table 3 of part one). The d. 2, m value would be based on only one. Therefore, for this example, d. The values of d. 2*. Table 3 of part one. In addition, a more accurate estimate of. Use a correction factor to. The modified equation is: in which is the. CF 1). The estimation of the true product or part. The correction. factor is similar to CF 1 but with a different denominator in the. The improved estimation of the part or product. CF 2). Given these changes, the new measurement study. Therefore, the new method. Table 2. Solving Identified Problem Areas in the. Measurement. For a measurement process with a problem in the. The first is to check. If a problem of resolution occurs, consider using a. For. example, if the measurement unit of a data set is 0. R& R. study. Another way to improve gage accuracy is to. Although most measurement gage. R& R study. The user also should make. When appraiser bias effect is detected, the. However, the. long- term solution is to understand why that appraiser has a bias. When appraiser inconsistency is. For example, he or she may not align the. Also, the appraiser. Many of these problems are the result of. Either the appraiser needs to undergo a. Change Current Method. A graphical analysis helps in understanding the. Current AIAG R& R methods may be misleading and. Also, appropriate software could be used to calculate the correct. This two- part column has shown the importance. I hope it will. help all quality conscious organizations further improve their. REFERENCES. Donald S. Ermer, “Improved Gage. R& R Measurement Studies,” part one, Quality Progress. March 2. 00. 6. L. A. Brown, B. R. Daugherty and V. W. Lowe. Measurement Systems Analysis, third edition, Auto Industry Action. Group, 2. 00. 3. Graeme G. Payne, “Calibration: Who. Does It,” Quality Progress, July 2. DONALD S. ERMER is the. Procter & Gamble professor emeritus of total quality at the. University of Wisconsin- Madison, where he also earned his. Ermer is an ASQ Fellow, is. Madison Section 1. ASQ’s 1. 99. 7. Edward Oakley Award and 2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2017
Categories |